Notice is hereby given that a Meeting of the Nightcaps Community Development Area Subcommittee will be held on:
Date: Time: Meeting Room:
|
Tuesday, 10 May 2016 5.30pm Nightcaps Hall, 13 Johnston Road, Nightcaps |
Nightcaps Community Development Area Subcommittee Agenda
|
MEMBERSHIP
Chairperson |
Bev Evans |
|
Deputy Chairperson |
Wayne Williams |
|
Members |
Annette Blackler |
|
|
Bill Brown |
|
|
Mark Marnane |
|
|
Jamie Shepherd |
|
Councillor |
Stuart Baird |
|
IN ATTENDANCE
Team Leader, Governance |
Chris Dolan |
|
Community Engineer |
Leighton Hare |
|
Committee Advisor |
Alyson Hamilton |
|
|
Contact Telephone: 0800 732 732 Postal Address: PO Box 903, Invercargill 9840 Email: emailsdc@southlanddc.govt.nz Website: www.southlanddc.govt.nz
Full agendas are available on Council’s Website |
|
Terms of Reference for CDAs
This CDA is a subcommittee of Southland District Council and has delegated responsibility.
The CDA members are elected to represent and advocate for their community.
It can make decisions on:
· Managing local halls and cemeteries
· Managing reserves, plantings, drainage, footpaths, street lighting, camping grounds, wharves, jetties, lakeshores and slipways, litter control
It can make recommendations to Council on:
· Priorities for services and development within the community
· Local rates
· Spending outside the approved annual budget
Nightcaps Community Development Area Subcommittee 10 May 2016 |
ITEM PAGE
Procedural
1 Apologies 4
2 Leave of absence 4
3 Conflict of Interest 4
4 Public Forum 4
5 Extraordinary/Urgent Items 4
6 Confirmation of Minutes 4
Reports
7.1 Works and Finance to Nightcaps Community Development Area Subcommittee for the period ended 31 March 2016 11
7.2 Bylaw Review Process 17
7.3 Draft Unmanned Aerial Vehicles Policy 19
7.4 Community Partnership Leader - Overview of role 29
UPDATES
8.1 Local Liaison Persons Report
• Township Works – Wayne Williams, Jamie Shepherd, Bev Evans
• Parks & Reserves – Bill Brown, Annette Blackler, Mark Marnane
• Community Housing – Bev Evans, Annette Blackler
• Hall – Jamie Shepherd, Bev Evans, Wayne Williams
• Ohai/Nightcaps/Wairio Water Supply – Bill Brown, Mark Marnane
• Ohai/Nightcaps & Districts Doctors House & Surgery Committee – Bev Evans
• Library – Bev Evans
• Mines – Mark Marnane, Wayne Williams, Bev Evans
8.2 Chairperson’s Report
The Chairperson, Member Evans to report on matters with which she has been involved since the subcommittee’s last meeting.
8.3 Councillor’s Report
Councillor Baird to report on activities from the District Council table
At the close of the agenda no apologies had been received.
2 Leave of absence
At the close of the agenda no requests for leave of absence had been received.
3 Conflict of Interest
Subcommittee Members are reminded of the need to be vigilant to stand aside from decision-making when a conflict arises between their role as a member and any private or other external interest they might have.
4 Public Forum
Notification to speak is required by 5pm at least two days before the meeting. Further information is available on www.southlanddc.govt.nz or phoning 0800 732 732.
5 Extraordinary/Urgent Items
To consider, and if thought fit, to pass a resolution to permit the committee to consider any further items which do not appear on the Agenda of this meeting and/or the meeting to be held with the public excluded.
Such resolution is required to be made pursuant to Section 46A(7) of the Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act 1987, and the Chairperson must advise:
(i) the reason why the item was not on the Agenda, and
(ii) the reason why the discussion of this item cannot be delayed until a subsequent meeting.
Section 46A(7A) of the Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act 1987 (as amended) states:
“Where an item is not on the agenda for a meeting,-
(a) that item may be discussed at that meeting if-
(i) that item is a minor matter relating to the general business of the local authority; and
(ii) the presiding member explains at the beginning of the meeting, at a time when it is open to the public, that the item will be discussed at the meeting; but
(b) no resolution, decision or recommendation may be made in respect of that item except to refer that item to a subsequent meeting of the local authority for further discussion.”
6 Confirmation of Minutes
6.1 Meeting minutes of Nightcaps Community Development Area Subcommittee, 16 February 2016
Nightcaps Community Development Area Subcommittee
OPEN MINUTES
|
Minutes of a meeting of Nightcaps Community Development Area Subcommittee held in the Nightcaps Hall, Johnston Road, Nightcaps on Tuesday, 16 February 2016 at 7.30pm.
present
Chairperson |
Bev Evans |
|
Deputy Chairperson |
Wayne Williams |
|
Members |
Annette Blackler |
|
|
Bill Brown |
|
|
Mark Marnane |
|
|
Jamie Shepherd |
|
|
|
|
Councillor |
Stuart Baird |
|
IN ATTENDANCE
Community Engineer |
Leighton Hare |
|
Committee Advisor |
Kelly Tagg |
|
1 Apologies
At the close of the agenda no apologies had been received.
2 Leave of absence
No requests for leave of absence had been received.
3 Conflict of Interest
There were no conflicts of interest declared.
4 Public Forum
There were no members of the public seeking speaking rights in the Public Forum section of the meeting.
5 Extraordinary/Urgent Items
There were no Extraordinary/Urgent items.
6 Confirmation of Minutes
Resolution Moved Member Williams, seconded Member Shepherd Confirms the minutes of Nightcaps Community Development Area Subcommittee meeting held on 17 November 2015. |
Reports
7.1 |
Works and Finance to Nightcaps Community Development Area Subcommittee for the period ended 31 December 2015 Record No: R/16/1/880 |
|
The Works and Finance report for the period ended 31 December 2015, was tabled.
The Area Engineer advised the meeting he was awaiting a quote from SouthRoads for some footpath repairs.
|
|
Resolution Moved Member Marnane, seconded Member Blackler That the Nightcaps Community Development Area Subcommittee: a) Receives the report titled “Works and Finance to Nightcaps Community Development Area Subcommittee for the period ended 31 December 2015” dated 21 January 2016.
|
7.2 |
Ohai Railway Rolling Stock Record No: R/16/2/1801 |
|
R1 Report prepared by Ian Marshall (Group Manager, Services & Assets) advising that the future of the old rolling stock from the Ohai Railway needs to be dealt with, was tabled. The meeting was reminded that the old Ohai Railway rolling stock is still sitting in storage in the KiwiRail sheds at Wairio; KiwiRail now require the shed to be vacated. The subcommittee noted that attempts to find a suitable home for the rolling stock in the Ohai/Nightcaps area have been unsuccessful and that Council has to find a long term viable option for these railway assets now. The meeting was informed that the four items with the highest heritage value need to be housed in a suitable manner in order to protect their value. For example; (a) The DSB Mitsubishi Locomotive (diesel shunter) could be on display in the open but preferably undercover. (b) The carriages need to be undercover as a minimum but preferably in a fully enclosed display. (c) The guards van needs to be in a fully enclosed display. In his report Mr Marshall stated that along with protecting the heritage value of the assets it is highly desirable to retain the assets within the Southland District so that the history of the Ohai Railway Board can be told in conjunction with the display in such a way as to be relevant to the Ohai/Nightcaps area. Furthermore, a location with high numbers of passing visitors is desirable to maximise the exposure of the train and so maximise the opportunity for the history of the Ohai/Nightcaps area to be told to as many people as possible, this would also help promote the Ohai and Nightcaps area. The meeting noted that the exception to this is the guards van which is recognised as having a heritage value that is nationally significant and consequently, it should be on display in one of the large national railway museums. The report outlined a proposal for consideration by the subcommittee as follows;
In discussing this item the Nightcaps CDA expressed an interest in retaining the former boardroom table and chairs for use in the Nightcaps Hall. The meeting noted that the Eaves Steam Sawmill Nightcaps Trust is interested in housing the diesel Locomotive (ORB1) and the two carriages. The CDA was advised that the Trust would like to see these items preserved and kept in the area. The Trust advised there is a large shed in Nightcaps which could to store the train and carriages and say a static display would add to their working steam display. The CDA was supportive of the approach by Eaves Steam Sawmill. |
|
Resolution Moved Member Williams, seconded Member Blackler That the Nightcaps Community Development Area Subcommittee: a) Receives the report titled “Ohai Railway Rolling Stock” dated 9 February 2016. |
Updates
8.1 |
Local Liaison Persons |
|
|
|
|
8.2 |
Chairperson's Report |
|
The Chairperson, Member Evans, reported on matters with which she has been involved since the Board’s last meeting. This included the following;
Member Evans identified the cemetery information sign and the butcher shop corner as two projects she would like the CDA to complete this year. Member Evans to seek assistance from the Ohai/Nightcaps Lions Club to check the names on the cemetery information sign. |
8.3 |
Councillor's Report |
|
Councillor Baird reported on matters from the District Council table which included the following;
|
The meeting concluded at 9pm. CONFIRMED AS A TRUE AND CORRECT RECORD AT A MEETING OF THE Nightcaps Community Development Area Subcommittee HELD ON 16 FEBRUARY 2016.
DATE:...................................................................
CHAIRPERSON:...................................................
Nightcaps Community Development Area Subcommittee 10 May 2016 |
Works and Finance to Nightcaps Community Development Area Subcommittee for the period ended 31 March 2016
Record No: R/16/4/5817
Author: Leighton Hare, Community Engineer
Approved by: Ian Marshall, Group Manager Services and Assets
☐ Decision ☐ Recommendation ☒ Information
Community Engineer’s Report
1 Community Engineer was on annual leave at the time this report was written. An update on projects and financials will be provided at the meeting.
Water and Waste Engineer’s Report
2 The monthly operations reports from Downer are provided to the Subcommittee Secretary as they are published. They include data on Downer’s district-wide operations activities which is presented on a town by town basis.
3 For the year to date, there has been no unplanned expenditure exceeding the $5,000 threshold.
Financial Considerations
Development and Financial Contributions
4 The table below outlines the balances of Development and Financial contributions for your community to date. Spending of these funds is considered by Council staff when projects are in the planning stage. Once identified as a potential funding source for a project, confirmation from the Group Manager Services and Assets is sought before undertaking the project to ensure that the relevant policy and legislative requirements are met.
Sewerage |
$7,475 |
Reserves
5 Please find the reserves report attached.
Project List
6 The table below shows all of the projects that are currently planned for Nightcaps in 2015/2016 including carry forwards from previous years with an update on their progress. Carry forwards are identified in the following table as bold and italic.
Activity |
Project Name |
Type |
Year |
Budget |
Status |
Officer’s Comment |
Community Centres |
Interior Painting and New Cupboard Doors |
O&M |
16/17 |
$14,666 |
Construction |
Finalising dates to complete the work. |
Stormwater |
Dryfe Street Repairs |
REN |
15/16 |
$130,055 |
Complete |
|
That the Nightcaps Community Development Area Subcommittee: a) Receives the report titled “Works and Finance to Nightcaps Community Development Area Subcommittee for the period ended 31 March 2016” dated 25 April 2016. |
a Nightcaps Financial Reports, 31 March 2016 View
Nightcaps Community Development Area Subcommittee 10 May 2016 |
Record No: R/16/4/5201
Author: Tamara Dytor, Policy Analyst
Approved by: Rex Capil, Group Manager Community and Futures
☐ Decision ☐ Recommendation ☒ Information
Executive Summary
1 In 2016, the Cemetery Bylaw 2006, the Keeping of Animals, Poultry and Bees Bylaw 2010 and the Control of Advertising Signs Bylaw 2008 will be reviewed. This report outlines the approach that will be taken to consultation and review.
Background
2 Council will be reviewing three bylaws in 2016. The drivers for each review are outlined below:
· The Cemetery Bylaw 2006 requires review in 2016 to remain current.
· A review of the Keeping of Animals, Poultry and Bees Bylaw 2010 is recommended to address local issues. This bylaw was reviewed in 2010 however, since this time additional issues have arisen. The keeping of animals in urban areas has become an area of contention in some communities.
· A review of the Control of Advertising Signs Bylaw 2008 is recommended to align with the District Plan. This will provide clarity for the public and address issues across the District relating to signage. The proposed bylaw review would address the placement of signs in the road reserve, for example sandwich boards on footpaths. Changes to the bylaw are intended to increase the ease of doing business with Council and provide clarity and consistency.
Timeline
3 The timeline below outlines key milestones in the process of review and details the approach to public engagement.
Date |
Task |
Mid-May 2016 |
Pre-consultation engagement sessions. Sessions are also for other Long Term Plan issues. |
8 June 2016 |
Council meeting (Endorse draft bylaws for public consultation) |
8 June 2016 |
Notification given to Area Offices, and customer services. Committee Advisors to liaise with CB and CDA chairs to remind them of the submission period. |
9 June 2016 |
Draft bylaws advertised. |
9 Jun – 30 Jun 2016 |
Submission period. |
20 July 2016 |
Council meeting (Submission Hearings) |
2 Aug 2016 |
Amendments made to draft bylaws. |
17 Aug 2016 |
Council meeting (Deliberations) |
7 Sep 2016 |
Council meeting (Adoption of bylaws) |
8 Sep 2016 |
Advertising of adopted bylaws. |
Sep – Oct 2016 |
Present report to CDAs on new bylaws. |
Nov – Dec 2016 |
Present report to CBs on new bylaws. |
Consultation and engagement
4 Community views will be considered during formal consultation and during pre-consultation engagement. The timeline above details when this will occur.
5 Community Boards and Community Development Area Subcommittees are asked to make submissions during the consultation period and individual members can engage during pre-consultation sessions in May.
That the Nightcaps Community Development Area Subcommittee: a) Receives the report titled “Bylaw Review Process” dated 12 April 2016. |
There are no attachments for this report.
Nightcaps Community Development Area Subcommittee 10 May 2016 |
Draft Unmanned Aerial Vehicles Policy
Record No: R/16/4/5652
Author: Tamara Dytor, Policy Analyst
Approved by: Rex Capil, Group Manager Community and Futures
☒ Decision ☐ Recommendation ☐ Information
Purpose
1 This report presents the draft Use of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles Policy. A recommendation is sought from Community Boards and Community Development Area Subcommittees regarding local areas that should be considered for restriction or prohibition of unmanned aerial vehicle use.
Executive Summary
2 Under new rules introduced by the Civil Aviation Authority (CAA), Council can grant or decline consent for the use of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) on property that it owns or controls. The draft Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Policy sets a framework to allow Council to do this.
3 The draft Use of Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Policy contains broad conditions which would apply throughout the District. Feedback is requested from Community Boards and Community Development Area Subcommittees to determine whether Council should consider prohibition or restriction in specific local areas.
That the Nightcaps Community Development Area Subcommittee: a) Receives the report titled “Draft Unmanned Aerial Vehicles Policy” dated 19 April 2016. b) Determines that this matter or decision be recognised as not significant in terms of Section 76 of the Local Government Act 2002. c) Determines that it has complied with the decision-making provisions of the Local Government Act 2002 to the extent necessary in relation to this decision; and in accordance with Section 79 of the Act determines that it does not require further information, further assessment of options or further analysis of costs and benefits or advantages and disadvantages prior to making a decision on this matter. d) Recommend any local areas that should be considered as restricted or prohibited areas for the use of unmanned aerial vehicles. |
Content
Background
4 Rules introduced by the Civil Aviation Authority (CAA) came into effect on 1 August 2015. The rules require people to obtain Council approval to operate UAVs on public land.
5 The draft Use of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles Policy broadly allows for the use of unmanned aerial vehicles in the District, provided that users comply with conditions within the policy. These conditions exist in addition to those already imposed across New Zealand by the CAA.
6 The majority of UAV use is likely to occur in Council’s parks, reserves and open spaces.
What is an UAV?
The term UAV covers all electric powered remote controlled model aircraft of the type commonly referred to as “drones” that are capable of vertical take-off and landing and small hand-launched gliders less than a 1.5 metre wing span. It does not cover the following:
· Fixed wing electric-powered model aircraft greater than 1 metre wing span.
· All fixed - winged model aircraft that are internal combustion engine (petrol) powered.
· Gliders greater than a 1.5 metre wing span and bungee-launched gliders.
· Single rotor helicopters that are electric powered or internal combustion engine (petrol) powered.
· Jet powered models.
CAA Regulations
CAA rules apply to all UAV operators throughout New Zealand. CAA rules Part 101 require 12 key things from UAV operators. Operators must:
1. Not operate an UAV 25 kg or larger and always ensure that the UAV is safe to operate;
2. Take all practicable steps to minimise hazards to persons, property and other aircraft;
3. Fly only in daylight;
4. Give way to all crewed aircraft;
5. Be able to see the UAV with their own eyes;
6. Not fly higher than 120 metres (400 feet) (unless certain conditions are met);
7. Have knowledge of airspace restrictions;
8. Not fly closer than four kilometres from any aerodrome (unless certain conditions are met);
9. Obtain an air traffic control clearance issued by Airways (when flying in controlled airspace);
10. Not fly in special use airspace without the permission of the controlling authority of the area (eg, military operating areas, low flying zones, danger areas or restricted areas);
11. Have consent from anyone you want to fly above;
12. Have the consent of the property owner or person in charge of the area you want to fly above.
7 Rules are enforceable by the CAA and a breach could result in a fine, a written warning, or prosecution.
Issues
Approach taken in the draft Use of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles Policy
8 The draft policy nominates some circumstances in which UAV use is not permitted without specific approval from Council. These restrictions apply:
· Over a sports field if in use by others, or within 50 metres of any organised activity taking place in a reserve or Council controlled open space;
· Over or above Council owned or controlled cemeteries or formed roads;
· Over or within 50 metres of other users of open spaces;
· Over or within 50 metres of any building on Council land or any playground equipment, furniture, swimming pool, or track on a reserve;
· Within 50 metres of livestock, wildlife or sensitive wildlife habitats; and
· Within 50 metres of a reserve boundary where residential housing or stock farming adjoins.
9 In addition to these conditions, Community Boards and Community Area Subcommittees are being asked whether there are any local areas that should be considered for restriction or prohibition.
10 Council is keen to ensure that UAV use is appropriate to community needs. There is no benefit in allowing use where it is inappropriate or unsafe. Conversely, there is also no benefit in being unnecessarily restrictive in regards to this recreational activity.
11 Since the definition of an UAV includes model airplanes, it is important to consider the impact of this policy on existing clubs and associations.
Current use and incidents
12 The extent of UAV use in the Southland District is currently unknown. No complaints to Council regarding the use of UAVs were identified during the development of this report. However, across New Zealand the number of incidents reported to the CAA has grown significantly in recent years. The tables below detail the number of incidents across New Zealand by year and by incident type.
Total incidents annually
Year |
Total incidents |
2008 |
1 |
2009 |
0 |
2010 |
1 |
2011 |
4 |
2012 |
11 |
2013 |
10 |
2014 |
33 |
2015 |
120 |
Total |
184 |
Number of incidents by incident type
Incident type* |
Total incidents |
Aviation-related concern |
116 |
Airspace incident |
61 |
Incident |
5 |
Accident |
2 |
Grand Total |
184 |
*Incident definitions
Aviation-related concern: these are ‘concerns’ relating to aviation safety or securing, and include complaints and allegations about suspected rule breaches, etc.
Airspace incident: incidents that involve deviations from airspace rules and procedures (minimum distances for aircraft separation, for example).
Incident: a general incident category that covers situations where there is a risk of harm occurring but this does not eventuate.
13 There have been four incidents involving UAVs in the Southland region, one of which was in the Southland District. Three of these were aviation-related concerns, one was an airspace incident. The details of each are in the table below:
Date |
Description |
Location |
30-Oct-13 |
Concern UAV flying on farms and potentially causing a hazard to other aircraft in the area. |
Otama Hill Road, Gore |
13-Jun-14 |
Concern about UAV flying near an airliner and a low flying area. Referred to the Regulatory Investigations Unit. |
Invercargill |
14-Apr-15 |
Concern that a UAV was flown in close proximity to the airport. |
Invercargill |
11-Nov-15 |
Unauthorised UAV operations 100 metres from the airport. The operators were two foreign nationals. |
Milford Sound |
14 To date, 10 enforcement actions have been undertaken by the CAA’s Regulatory Investigations Unit in relation to UAV operations. Five of these have been written warnings, and five have been infringement notices with fines ranging from $500 to $3,500.
15 At this stage staff have not identified any complaints to Council regarding the use of UAVs in the Southland District. To balance the fact that there is not a current significant issue with UAVs and the likelihood of risks in the future, a moderate and proportionate response to manage this issue would be appropriate. Council also needs to be mindful of existing UAV users such as the Fiordland Cloudbusters Model Aircraft Club, who have operated UAVs to date without any issues.
Enforcement
16 The CAA has the power to regulate UAV use through mechanisms ranging from warnings to prosecution, depending on the nature of incidents.
17 CAA officers have indicated that if reported issues are of a serious nature involving the endangerment of people or property or reckless use of UAVs, an investigation with a view towards prosecution would be likely to occur. For less serious breaches, warnings or infringements are more likely to be considered.
18 In the event of a breach of the policy, Council staff would report any incident to the CAA. The incident would be recorded so that the CAA can gather a realistic picture of issues relating to drones and of any operators who breach the rules on multiple occasions. In the opinion of staff in the CAA investigations team, a Council bylaw would be an unnecessary duplication of existing powers under the CAA Regulatory Enforcement Policy.
Factors to Consider
Legal and Statutory Requirements
19 Council is empowered to adopt a position by CAA rules. The CAA has power to enforce its rules (including permission and conditions of land owners) using mechanisms ranging from warnings and infringements to prosecutions.
20 Since there is currently insufficient evidence of a serious issue relating to UAV use in the Southland District a bylaw is not a proportionate response. Also, enforcement powers of a bylaw largely duplicate enforcement that could be undertaken through CAA legislation. While Council could state its position through guidelines, staff recommend a policy approach to ensure clarity.
Community Views
21 This report is part of the process of gathering community views and forming a policy that meets local needs.
Costs and Funding
22 There are no costs associated with implementing an Use of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles Policy, other than those associated with advertising and consultation. This is because any enforcement action would be referred to the CAA.
Policy Implications
23 If an Use of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles Policy is adopted, it will be referred to in Council’s Reserves Management Policy.
Analysis
Options Considered
24 Community Boards and Community Development Area Subcommittees could:
· Option 1: Nominate local areas that should be considered for inclusion in the policy as restricted or prohibited areas; or
· Option 2: Not nominate local areas that should be considered for inclusion in the policy as restricted or prohibited areas.
Analysis of Options
Option 1 – Nominate local areas that should be considered for inclusion in the policy as restricted or prohibited areas.
Advantages |
Disadvantages |
· Responds to any circumstances or requirements specific to local communities. |
· It is important for recommendations not to be unnecessarily restrictive because Council’s general proposed approach is broadly permissive. |
Option 2 – Not nominate local areas that should be considered for inclusion in the policy as restricted or prohibited areas.
Advantages |
Disadvantages |
· Provides a clear, fair and consistent approach across the District. |
· The broad approach may or may not meet local needs and match local circumstances. |
Assessment of Significance
25 This issue has not been assessed as significant because at this stage it is not affecting a large number of people or stakeholders or a specific community. Council’s ability to make decisions in relation to UAV use are established by CAA rules and the proposed approach is generally permissive.
Recommended Option
26 It is recommended that Community Boards and Community Development Area Subcommittees only propose restricted or prohibited areas for inclusion in the policy if this reflects community needs and local circumstances and if these areas are not already adequately managed through the existing broad conditions within the draft policy.
Next Steps
27 Following input from Community Boards and Community Development Area Subcommittees, this policy will be subject to public consultation.
a Draft Use of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles Policy View
Nightcaps Community Development Area Subcommittee |
10 May 2016 |
USE OF UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLES POLICY
This policy applies to:
DOCUMENT CONTROL
Administered by: Strategic Manager (Property) |
TRIM reference number: r/15/12/22465 |
Effective date: «type date» |
Approved by: Council |
Date approved: «type date» |
Next review date: «type date» |
CONTENTS
1. PURPOSE
2. DEFINITIONS AND ABBREVIATIONS
3 BACKGROUND
4. POLICY DETAILS
4.1 General Criteria
4.2 Restrictions
4.3 Prohibited Areas
4.4 Enforcement
5. ASSOCIATED DOCUMENTS
6. REVISION RECORD
Nightcaps Community Development Area Subcommittee |
10 May 2016 |
USE OF UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLES POLICY
1. PURPOSE
This policy sets out the conditions for use of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) on Council owned or controlled land.
2. DEFINITIONS AND ABBREVIATIONS
Term |
Meaning |
Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) |
The term UAV covers all electric powered remote controlled model aircraft, including the type commonly referred to as “drones” that are capable of vertical take-off and landing and small hand-launched gliders less than 1.5 metre wing span.
UAVs are also known as drones, Remotely Piloted Aircraft Systems and Unmanned Aerial Systems.
The term UAV does not include the following: · Fixed wing electric-powered model aircraft greater than 1 metre wing span. · All fixed - winged model aircraft that are internal combustion engine (petrol) powered. · Gliders greater than 1.5 metre wing span and bungee-launched gliders. · Single rotor helicopters that are electric powered or internal combustion engine (petrol) powered. · Jet powered models.
|
Civil Aviation Authority Rules / CAA rules |
Civil Aviation Rules are set by the Minister of Transport. The rules are divided into parts. The two parts relevant to UAVs are: · Part 101: Gyrogliders and Parasails, Unmanned Aircraft (including Balloons), Kites, and Rockets - Operating Rules, and · Part 102: Unmanned Aircraft Operator Certification.
|
3 BACKGROUND
Under rules introduced by the Civil Aviation Authority (CAA) on 1 August 2015, Council can grant or decline consent for the use of UAVs on property that it owns or controls. This policy establishes criteria for UAV use over Council owned and controlled land in the Southland District.
4. POLICY DETAILS
4.1 General Criteria
In addition to CAA rules, the following criteria apply to the use of UAVs over land or property owned or controlled by Southland District Council. They do not apply to the use of UAVs by Southland District Council.
Operators of UAVs must:
· Comply with the Office of the Privacy Commissioner guidance on preserving peoples’ personal privacy by not flying over other people or adjoining private property without their consent.
· Be courteous of other park users, who often are there for the quiet enjoyment of Council’s parks, reserves and open spaces.
4.2 Restrictions
Operators must not use UAVs under the following conditions unless specific written approval has been granted by Council:
· If requested to cease by Council officers. Users must land their UAV immediately if requested by Council officers.
· Over a sports field if in use by others, or within 50 metres of any organised activity taking place in a reserve or Council controlled open space.
· Over or above Council owned or controlled cemeteries or formed roads.
· Over or within 50 metres of other users of open spaces. If another open space user moves within this range, the UAV user must immediately land their UAV.
· Over or within 50 metres of any building on Council land or any playground equipment, furniture, swimming pool, or track on a reserve.
· Within 50 metres of livestock, wildlife or sensitive wildlife habitats. If livestock or wildlife move within this range, the UAV user must immediately land their UAV.
· Within 50 metres of a reserve boundary where residential housing or stock farming adjoins.
Written Council approval must also be obtained for any organised event involving the use of UAVs.
Operators of UAVs must comply with any additional conditions of lease holders.
4.3 Prohibited Areas
There are some areas where the use of UAVs is prohibited unless written approval has been granted by Council. These areas are:
· Local areas will be determined by Council following feedback from Community Boards and Community Development Area Subcommittees.
4.4 Reporting incidents and near misses
UAV users must report all incidents and near misses to Southland District Council. This obligation also extends to other reserve users involved in any incident or near miss relating to UAV use.
4.5 Enforcement
Any breach of the above conditions could result in termination of your permission to fly unmanned aircraft over Council land.
Council will report breaches to the Civil Aviation Authority, which may result in infringements or prosecution.
5. ASSOCIATED DOCUMENTS
• Civil Aviation Authority Rules and Guidelines: http://www.caa.govt.nz/rpas/
• Southland District Council District Reserves Management Policy
6. REVISION RECORD
Date |
Version |
Revision Description |
«Type Date» |
«Version» |
«Revision» |
«Type Date» |
«Version» |
«Revision» |
«Type Date» |
«Version» |
«Revision» |
Nightcaps Community Development Area Subcommittee 10 May 2016 |
Community Partnership Leader - Overview of role
Record No: R/16/5/6279
Author: Kelly Tagg, Community Partnership Leader
Approved by: Rex Capil, Group Manager Community and Futures
☐ Decision ☐ Recommendation ☒ Information
1 Kelly Tagg (Community Partnership Leader, Northern and Western Southland) will be in attendance in order to provide an update to the CDA on the newly established Community Partnership Leader positions and the role they will have in the community going forward.
That the Nightcaps Community Development Area Subcommittee: a) Receives the report titled “Community Partnership Leader - Overview of role” dated 2 May 2016.
|
a Community Partnership Leader - Overview of role View